Have you ever done a ‘leadership’ exercise?
I’m sure you know the sort of thing – You’re on a corporate “training day” and after being placed into arbitrary groups in a stuffy meeting room, you are given a handful of straws, paperclips and plastic cups and told to build a tower that reaches the ceiling. Oh, and it’s a race.
Normally billed as a light-hearted ‘ice breaker’, such tasks are watched by an eagle-eyed organiser – on the lookout for the ‘natural leaders’. Which people are the ‘doers’; who are the diplomatic types; and who like the sound of their own voice a little too much?! These activities make me cringe – they feel artificial and forced – and worse, presume that true leadership can be identified in a conference room.
But is leadership really an inherent ability that some of us have but others don’t? Researchers from the University of Amsterdam seem to think so. In newly published work, they claim to have developed a computer program that not only predicts who are the best leaders from facial characteristics, but will also tell you who will win the next presidential election…
Could you be a Leader?
When I was sixteen I wanted to join the Army and I applied for a two day Army leadership test. I didn’t do very well. Shouting men in beret’s made me irritable. It was fun (in a strange, masochistic way) and I failed catastrophically. Clearly, I’m not military material.
The Army spends a lot of time and energy searching out future leaders – people who will inspire, motivate and, if the time comes, lead people to die. The US Armed Forces have gone as far so as to fund the development of a computer system that – presumably – they hope will be able to spot the next generation of leaders. Dutch leadership theorists were tasked with the job and, bizarrely, they came up with a computer program that relies on facial characteristics to spot folk destined for the top…
How the Computer spots a Born Leader…
Mark van Vugt from Amsterdam University devised a rather complex theory on leadership called the “evolutionary leadership theory”. One of the key tenets of this (and several other) leadership theories is that different people are better suited to lead in different situations. Let’s face it, I may not be cut out for leading a platoon – but I can run a pretty good pub quiz.
Applying this theory, researchers from Amsterdam University argue that these principles go pretty deep:
- When we feel threatened, we will choose masculine individuals to lead
- Women (or those with feminine features) are normally picked as leaders when life seems peaceful
- If everything around feels to be rapidly changing, a younger person looks the better leader
- When we feel stable and secure, an old person makes for the best leader.
They compiled these and a handful of other leadership characteristics into a mathematically mind-melting computer simulation. Then they tested it on data from the most recent US presidential elections.
The Software that Predicts Election Results…
Pumping in opinion data from the 2004 and 2008 US presidential elections to their silicon election predictor, they compared Gallup poll results with their computer’s predicted ones. Naturally, their results made striking similarities to actual poll results – although it is quite possible they went back and ‘tweaked’ their original equations until the results matched…
Trying to prove the worth of their computer creation, the Dutch research duo Spisak and Sharpanskykh organised a simple ‘voting game’ with fifty college students. Again, their computer’s predictions closely matched real voting behaviour.
Whether this computer software has any real use in the real world is yet to be answered – although the programmers certainly think it has… (and they think it’s far better than balancing plastic cups)
The Subversive Uses of a Computerised Leadership Predictor
The notion of a ‘natural leader’ for all situations is, thankfully, largely consigned to the history books. Life experience shows that this simply isn’t the case – a leader on the battlefield will probably be hopeless running a retirement home tea party.
I suspect that large corporations, the military and political think-tanks would be overjoyed if their ‘ideal’ future leaders could be found with a simple click of the mouse. The software showcased in this research is still in prototype stage, but future iterations will certainly get much closer to this reality.
One suspicious use of this computer program software that its developers suggest is that it be used by politicians to “manipulate” how their voters view the world. In the same way that dictators convince their populous that an unseen enemy lurks at their doorstep, these Dutch researchers claim their new program will show how democratically elected individuals can apply media spin to gain the upper hand – and appear a more attractive leader than their opponents.
It was brave to openly publish such an idea: the suggestion that a computer program should inform the power-hungry on how to deceive their voters is pretty ethically twisted.
How possibly could this development be a step in the right direction? The notion that leadership is predetermined stinks of the eugenics movement. All of us have different abilities and capacities – but isn’t leadership just an ability like any other that can be learnt and developed?
Perhaps I am being naive but thankfully, the world I live in doesn’t seem to obey simple rules. Although planets, protons and plants follow laws, people around me never cease to amaze. Since homosapiens first emerged, unremarkable people have done, and continue to do, beautiful, exceptional and unexpected things…
And I certainly don’t think they’ll ever develop a computer program to predict that…
Thanks for reading – comments and feedback are warmly welcomed!
INTERESTED IN THIS SORT OF STUFF? I’ve been part of a team that has just launched a new (free) bi-monthly digital magazine which aims to deliver understandable science writing but without compromising the facts. It offers undiscovered writers a chance to write to a growing audience of readers. You are welcome to check it out here!
Spisak, B., Homan, A., Grabo, A., & Van Vugt, M. (2011). Facing the situation: Testing a biosocial contingency model of leadership in intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces The Leadership Quarterly DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.08.006
4 responses to “The Scary New Computer Program that spots Born Leaders and Predicts Election Results!”
Yes, the idea that physical features indicates a natural born leader does sound like it could have an unhealthy eugenics type fallout (look at Hitler and his SS). There are so many cultural, sociological, psychological, and other factors that create true leaders that it is unrealistic to try to define them by digital means. Although, in the TV age, an attractive face can make some difference in an election, the real proof in the pudding is the performance following the election.
I was initially intrigued, then later bemused and finally rather disturbed at what the researchers had tried to accomplish. It’s good to search out for characteristics that might distinguish one person’s ‘leadership’ from another – but then to propose that these findings should be used by the Army and politicians to their own ends seemed, well, wrong.
It reminded me of the origins of the IQ tests… https://realdoctorstu.com/2011/07/11/the-iq-myth-and-its-fascist-origins-just-how-intelligent-are-you/
Thanks for your comment,
That’s pretty interesting. I don’t think we always need a computer to predict election results though. Clever marketing and lies are the normal routes that are seemingly taken to get into power now days. Politicians avoid any controversial subjects and just play it safe to secure their position. This is having a negative effect on our societies as the controversial subjects are never resolved. Just look at the whole recycling and going green campaign that is going on currently. Pollution is not the problem, its our world population spiralling out of control that is causing these issues. For every person who cuts their carbon footprint in half another 3 people are born to replace them. Politicians wouldn’t dare to discuss population control though.
Interesting points! Thanks for commenting 🙂